<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 214 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, by majority view, held that it does not have jurisdiction to decide the issue and hear the appeal due to the express exclusion under Section 35B, first proviso, clause (b) of the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, 1944. Consequently, the appeal papers were directed to be returned to the appellants for filing before the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:26:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 214 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, by majority view, held that it does not have jurisdiction to decide the issue and hear the appeal due to the express exclusion under Section 35B, first proviso, clause (b) of the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, 1944. Consequently, the appeal papers were directed to be returned to the appellants for filing before the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>