<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 210 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the show cause notice invalid for demanding duty, upheld the interpretation of Sec. 11A, and dismissed the appeal regarding the imposition of penalty under Rule 173Q due to lack of evidence of intent to evade payment of duty by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 210 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the show cause notice invalid for demanding duty, upheld the interpretation of Sec. 11A, and dismissed the appeal regarding the imposition of penalty under Rule 173Q due to lack of evidence of intent to evade payment of duty by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>