<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 206 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were only required to pay interest up to the date of the out of charge order for clearance of the goods for home consumption. Any additional interest liability would apply only to further duty payable due to subsequent removal of the goods. The Tribunal also rejected the appellants&#039; plea for a one-year warehousing period, affirming that the permissible period was three months. The appeal was allowed on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:07:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 206 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were only required to pay interest up to the date of the out of charge order for clearance of the goods for home consumption. Any additional interest liability would apply only to further duty payable due to subsequent removal of the goods. The Tribunal also rejected the appellants&#039; plea for a one-year warehousing period, affirming that the permissible period was three months. The appeal was allowed on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>