https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80480 The High Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the gold seized under the Gold Control Act cannot be confiscated without providing notice and an opportunity to the owner as required by Sec. 79. The Court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to statutory provisions, directing the defendants to return the seized gold to the plaintiff and proceed with confiscation only after giving proper notice. The appeal was allowed, and costs were not awarded. en-us Tue, 17 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:03:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80480 The High Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the gold seized under the Gold Control Act cannot be confiscated without providing notice and an opportunity to the owner as required by Sec. 79. The Court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to statutory provisions, directing the defendants to return the seized gold to the plaintiff and proceed with confiscation only after giving proper notice. The appeal was allowed, and costs were not awarded. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80480