https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80479 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties on the applicants for clandestine removal of processed fabrics without excise duty payment. The Tribunal dismissed claims of penalty invalidity, reliance on inadmissible evidence, misplaced burden of proof, and errors in evidence evaluation. It found no violation of criminal jurisprudence, reasonable rejection of evidence, misinterpretation of documents, or prejudice from simultaneous disposal of appeals. The Tribunal's decision, not warranting High Court review, was grounded in a thorough evaluation of evidence, leading to the rejection of the applicants' contentions. en-us Fri, 05 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:00:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80479 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties on the applicants for clandestine removal of processed fabrics without excise duty payment. The Tribunal dismissed claims of penalty invalidity, reliance on inadmissible evidence, misplaced burden of proof, and errors in evidence evaluation. It found no violation of criminal jurisprudence, reasonable rejection of evidence, misinterpretation of documents, or prejudice from simultaneous disposal of appeals. The Tribunal's decision, not warranting High Court review, was grounded in a thorough evaluation of evidence, leading to the rejection of the applicants' contentions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80479