<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 190 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80469</link>
    <description>The appellate judge set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision regarding the import of a computer system under OGL. The judge determined that the keyboard and monitor combination constituted a console based on technical literature definitions. The judge found that the lower authority&#039;s decision did not consider authoritative opinions or definitions of a console, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:42:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 190 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80469</link>
      <description>The appellate judge set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision regarding the import of a computer system under OGL. The judge determined that the keyboard and monitor combination constituted a console based on technical literature definitions. The judge found that the lower authority&#039;s decision did not consider authoritative opinions or definitions of a console, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>