<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 188 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80467</link>
    <description>Separate import consignments cannot be clubbed to test licence validity absent tangible evidence of a colourable device or a split import across ports; the Ahmedabad shipment had to be examined on its own documents. The actual user condition under the REP licence was not met because the importer lacked a valid registration for the relevant place and line of manufacture, and the limited nature of the work did not satisfy the policy requirement. Confiscation of the goods and the penalty on the principal importer were therefore sustained, while penalties on the alleged co-importers were set aside for want of proof linking them to the import.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:36:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 188 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80467</link>
      <description>Separate import consignments cannot be clubbed to test licence validity absent tangible evidence of a colourable device or a split import across ports; the Ahmedabad shipment had to be examined on its own documents. The actual user condition under the REP licence was not met because the importer lacked a valid registration for the relevant place and line of manufacture, and the limited nature of the work did not satisfy the policy requirement. Confiscation of the goods and the penalty on the principal importer were therefore sustained, while penalties on the alleged co-importers were set aside for want of proof linking them to the import.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>