<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 171 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed that imported almonds in shell do not qualify as seeds under the import licence. It upheld the confiscation of the consignment, a redemption fine of Rs. 18.00 lacs, and a personal penalty of Rs. 2.00 lacs imposed by the Collector of Customs. The Tribunal found the customs authorities acted within their jurisdiction, and the appellants&#039; importation was not bona fide, resulting in dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the Collector&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 171 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed that imported almonds in shell do not qualify as seeds under the import licence. It upheld the confiscation of the consignment, a redemption fine of Rs. 18.00 lacs, and a personal penalty of Rs. 2.00 lacs imposed by the Collector of Customs. The Tribunal found the customs authorities acted within their jurisdiction, and the appellants&#039; importation was not bona fide, resulting in dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the Collector&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>