<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 278 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80465</link>
    <description>Paper-based decorative laminated sheets made from paper impregnated with chemicals and pressed into laminated form were treated as retaining their paper-based character rather than becoming articles of plastics merely because resin or polymerisation was used in manufacture. The Tribunal applied its earlier view on similar laminated goods and classified the product under Heading 4818.90 up to 28-2-1988 and under Heading 4823.90 from 1-3-1988. Refund claims rejected only because earlier classification orders were treated as final could not stand once the classification changed, so the affected refund matters were remanded for reconsideration under the revised tariff position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 278 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80465</link>
      <description>Paper-based decorative laminated sheets made from paper impregnated with chemicals and pressed into laminated form were treated as retaining their paper-based character rather than becoming articles of plastics merely because resin or polymerisation was used in manufacture. The Tribunal applied its earlier view on similar laminated goods and classified the product under Heading 4818.90 up to 28-2-1988 and under Heading 4823.90 from 1-3-1988. Refund claims rejected only because earlier classification orders were treated as final could not stand once the classification changed, so the affected refund matters were remanded for reconsideration under the revised tariff position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>