<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 123 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80461</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal due to the signatory issue on the impugned order, signed by a Deputy Collector. The Tribunal ruled that the appeal&#039;s jurisdiction would lie with the Collector (Appeals) based on the signatory&#039;s designation. Despite the appellant&#039;s urgent circumstances as a Foreigner of Indian Origin with imminent travel plans, the Tribunal emphasized the need for the appropriate forum to address questions regarding the officer&#039;s authority and delegation legality. The judgment stressed the importance of expeditiously resolving such matters in the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:52:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 123 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80461</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal due to the signatory issue on the impugned order, signed by a Deputy Collector. The Tribunal ruled that the appeal&#039;s jurisdiction would lie with the Collector (Appeals) based on the signatory&#039;s designation. Despite the appellant&#039;s urgent circumstances as a Foreigner of Indian Origin with imminent travel plans, the Tribunal emphasized the need for the appropriate forum to address questions regarding the officer&#039;s authority and delegation legality. The judgment stressed the importance of expeditiously resolving such matters in the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>