https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80456 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, against an order by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals). The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay, stating that the reasons provided, including inter-departmental correspondence, were insufficient to justify the delay. Citing Supreme Court precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the need for valid reasons for delay beyond the limitation period. As the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay, the appeal was dismissed on the grounds of being time-barred without delving into the case's merits. en-us Thu, 29 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:45:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80456 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, against an order by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals). The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay, stating that the reasons provided, including inter-departmental correspondence, were insufficient to justify the delay. Citing Supreme Court precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the need for valid reasons for delay beyond the limitation period. As the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay, the appeal was dismissed on the grounds of being time-barred without delving into the case's merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80456