<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 176 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80435</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore was dismissed, and the respondent was found entitled to notional credit for inputs covered by specific gate passes under Rule 57B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The omission in the gate passes was deemed a curable procedural irregularity rectified by a certificate from the Inspector of Central Excise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:30:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 176 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80435</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore was dismissed, and the respondent was found entitled to notional credit for inputs covered by specific gate passes under Rule 57B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The omission in the gate passes was deemed a curable procedural irregularity rectified by a certificate from the Inspector of Central Excise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>