<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 200 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80429</link>
    <description>Credit earned under the pre-MODVAT Rule 56A procedure, though quantified and sanctioned only after MODVAT commenced because proceedings were pending, was treated as deemed available before the new regime began. The construction adopted gave effect to the scheme&#039;s object, so the credit was regarded as lying in R.G. 23 and transferable to R.G. 23A under Rule 57H(3). On that basis, credit attributable to the earlier period was eligible for transfer despite the later sanction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:18:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 200 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80429</link>
      <description>Credit earned under the pre-MODVAT Rule 56A procedure, though quantified and sanctioned only after MODVAT commenced because proceedings were pending, was treated as deemed available before the new regime began. The construction adopted gave effect to the scheme&#039;s object, so the credit was regarded as lying in R.G. 23 and transferable to R.G. 23A under Rule 57H(3). On that basis, credit attributable to the earlier period was eligible for transfer despite the later sanction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>