<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 200 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the transfer of credit from R.G. 23 to R.G. 23A, emphasizing eligibility under Rule 56A and interpreting Rule 57H(3) in favor of the respondents. The decision highlighted the importance of aligning interpretations with the Scheme&#039;s objectives and considering pre-MODVAT credits as available for transfer, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and supporting the broad interpretation of rules to advance the Scheme&#039;s purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:18:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 200 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the transfer of credit from R.G. 23 to R.G. 23A, emphasizing eligibility under Rule 56A and interpreting Rule 57H(3) in favor of the respondents. The decision highlighted the importance of aligning interpretations with the Scheme&#039;s objectives and considering pre-MODVAT credits as available for transfer, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and supporting the broad interpretation of rules to advance the Scheme&#039;s purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>