<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 199 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80428</link>
    <description>Mere purification and mixing of duty-paid mineral oil with chemicals and earth did not amount to manufacture because excise applies only where processing produces a distinct excisable commodity; the material retained its character and was not classifiable under Tariff Item 8, so the Revenue&#039;s classification claim failed. On the appellate issue, once classification was in dispute, the Collector (Appeals) could determine the proper classification directly and was not obliged to remand the matter after rejecting Tariff Item 8, particularly where no separate remand relief was sought. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed on both grounds, leaving the assessee&#039;s relief undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:15:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 199 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80428</link>
      <description>Mere purification and mixing of duty-paid mineral oil with chemicals and earth did not amount to manufacture because excise applies only where processing produces a distinct excisable commodity; the material retained its character and was not classifiable under Tariff Item 8, so the Revenue&#039;s classification claim failed. On the appellate issue, once classification was in dispute, the Collector (Appeals) could determine the proper classification directly and was not obliged to remand the matter after rejecting Tariff Item 8, particularly where no separate remand relief was sought. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed on both grounds, leaving the assessee&#039;s relief undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>