https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80426 The tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It confirmed the correct classification of the product under Tariff Item (T.I.) 68, rejecting the Department's contention for classification under T.I. 42. The tribunal also granted consequential relief to the appellant, including setting aside the penalty and demand for duty for the period in question. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:08:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80426 The tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It confirmed the correct classification of the product under Tariff Item (T.I.) 68, rejecting the Department's contention for classification under T.I. 42. The tribunal also granted consequential relief to the appellant, including setting aside the penalty and demand for duty for the period in question. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80426