<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision of the Collector (Appeals) regarding the duty demand on fabrication and erection of steel work and sheet roofing, holding that duty cannot be charged on materials erected at the site. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that duty is payable on the price of boilers as removed from the factory, excluding post-clearance expenses. Similarly, duty on the steam system was determined to be payable on the value as cleared from the factory. The Tribunal upheld the invocation of the extended time limit for duty demand due to non-disclosure of contracts. The matter was remanded for further examination by the Assistant Collector.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:56:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision of the Collector (Appeals) regarding the duty demand on fabrication and erection of steel work and sheet roofing, holding that duty cannot be charged on materials erected at the site. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that duty is payable on the price of boilers as removed from the factory, excluding post-clearance expenses. Similarly, duty on the steam system was determined to be payable on the value as cleared from the factory. The Tribunal upheld the invocation of the extended time limit for duty demand due to non-disclosure of contracts. The matter was remanded for further examination by the Assistant Collector.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>