<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 187 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80416</link>
    <description>The case involved an appeal regarding non-accountal of excisable goods in a factory. The Asstt. Collector&#039;s order was set aside as they lacked authority to allege fraud and suppression under Section 11A. The Tribunal deemed the show cause notice defective for demanding duty before goods&#039; removal, making it void ab initio. Duty payment was considered only upon removal of goods. The Tribunal upheld setting aside the order, allowing the department to adjudicate on non-accountal separately. The show cause notice alleging suppression and misstatement was also deemed void ab initio, emphasizing the need for a proper notice before adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 187 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80416</link>
      <description>The case involved an appeal regarding non-accountal of excisable goods in a factory. The Asstt. Collector&#039;s order was set aside as they lacked authority to allege fraud and suppression under Section 11A. The Tribunal deemed the show cause notice defective for demanding duty before goods&#039; removal, making it void ab initio. Duty payment was considered only upon removal of goods. The Tribunal upheld setting aside the order, allowing the department to adjudicate on non-accountal separately. The show cause notice alleging suppression and misstatement was also deemed void ab initio, emphasizing the need for a proper notice before adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>