<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 186 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80414</link>
    <description>MODVAT credit on cotton seed oil was unavailable where the manufacturer had not filed the required declaration and obtained departmental acknowledgement before taking credit. The notification and rules treated that declaration as a condition precedent, so the scheme operated only prospectively after compliance. As the input had been used before the procedural requirement was met, the later claim to credit was rejected and the assessee&#039;s contention was not accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 186 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80414</link>
      <description>MODVAT credit on cotton seed oil was unavailable where the manufacturer had not filed the required declaration and obtained departmental acknowledgement before taking credit. The notification and rules treated that declaration as a condition precedent, so the scheme operated only prospectively after compliance. As the input had been used before the procedural requirement was met, the later claim to credit was rejected and the assessee&#039;s contention was not accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>