<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 202 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the imported designs and drawings were eligible for exemption from auxiliary duty under Customs Notification 112/87. The Tribunal emphasized that auxiliary duty is chargeable in addition to any customs duties, including those under the Customs Tariff Act. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:25:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 202 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the imported designs and drawings were eligible for exemption from auxiliary duty under Customs Notification 112/87. The Tribunal emphasized that auxiliary duty is chargeable in addition to any customs duties, including those under the Customs Tariff Act. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>