<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 201 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80409</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by remand, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and comprehensive consideration of technical evidence before reaching a final decision on excisability and duty liability regarding the sugar syrup manufacturing process. The Tribunal instructed a fresh review by the Collector, granting the appellants an opportunity to present their evidence during the hearing, addressing the violation of natural justice in the ex-parte proceedings and the disputed excisability and marketability of sugar syrup.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:22:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 201 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80409</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by remand, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and comprehensive consideration of technical evidence before reaching a final decision on excisability and duty liability regarding the sugar syrup manufacturing process. The Tribunal instructed a fresh review by the Collector, granting the appellants an opportunity to present their evidence during the hearing, addressing the violation of natural justice in the ex-parte proceedings and the disputed excisability and marketability of sugar syrup.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>