https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80400 The Tribunal rejected the applicants' request for modification of the order seeking reshipment of goods without re-export conditions, instead of payment of fines. The Tribunal held that the refusal by suppliers to take back the goods post-order did not constitute a mistake apparent on record. It emphasized that the original order was consistent with the applicants' requests and that the ineffectiveness of the order was due to subsequent developments, not an error in decision-making. The Tribunal concluded that the requested modification would amount to a review of the original order, which was impermissible under the statutory framework. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:48:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80400 The Tribunal rejected the applicants' request for modification of the order seeking reshipment of goods without re-export conditions, instead of payment of fines. The Tribunal held that the refusal by suppliers to take back the goods post-order did not constitute a mistake apparent on record. It emphasized that the original order was consistent with the applicants' requests and that the ineffectiveness of the order was due to subsequent developments, not an error in decision-making. The Tribunal concluded that the requested modification would amount to a review of the original order, which was impermissible under the statutory framework. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 12 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80400