https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80382 The Tribunal set aside the lower authority's order demanding duty from the appellant for exceeding the Acid Slurry clearance limit. It ruled that the production by two units should not be considered as one unit without concrete evidence of unified operations. Since the units were recognized as separate proprietory concerns and there was no proof of coordinated operations, the demand for duty based on clubbing the production of Acid Slurry by both units was rejected. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:56:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80382 The Tribunal set aside the lower authority's order demanding duty from the appellant for exceeding the Acid Slurry clearance limit. It ruled that the production by two units should not be considered as one unit without concrete evidence of unified operations. Since the units were recognized as separate proprietory concerns and there was no proof of coordinated operations, the demand for duty based on clubbing the production of Acid Slurry by both units was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80382