<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80381</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of impugned goods, Poppy Seeds - Khaskhas, under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to lack of required license. A redemption fine of Rs. 15,000 was imposed, reducing the initial penalty, and the personal penalty of Rs. 10,000 was set aside. The Tribunal stressed uniformity in penalty imposition to prevent discrimination and ordered a refund of excess amounts collected by the Revenue. The appeal was partly allowed with revised penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:54:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80381</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of impugned goods, Poppy Seeds - Khaskhas, under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to lack of required license. A redemption fine of Rs. 15,000 was imposed, reducing the initial penalty, and the personal penalty of Rs. 10,000 was set aside. The Tribunal stressed uniformity in penalty imposition to prevent discrimination and ordered a refund of excess amounts collected by the Revenue. The appeal was partly allowed with revised penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>