<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 224 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80369</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s findings that the three machines imported were separate entities but remanded the decision on the main machine&#039;s confiscation due to the absence of the Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate. The Tribunal stressed the importance of evidence-based assessments before confiscating goods or imposing penalties under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:36:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 224 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80369</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s findings that the three machines imported were separate entities but remanded the decision on the main machine&#039;s confiscation due to the absence of the Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate. The Tribunal stressed the importance of evidence-based assessments before confiscating goods or imposing penalties under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>