<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 332 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80368</link>
    <description>An Export House Certificate holder was held entitled to an additional licence without furnishing a separate RCMC from the Engineering Export Promotion Council, because an existing certificate from the Federation of Indian Export Organisations sufficiently established eligibility. The Court also held that REP licences obtained during the 1981-82 policy period could be endorsed and revalidated after the belated grant of the Export House Certificate, so that the petitioner was restored to the position it would have occupied if the certificate had been issued in time. The ancillary import benefits attached to the certificate for that policy year were therefore required to be made available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:31:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 332 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80368</link>
      <description>An Export House Certificate holder was held entitled to an additional licence without furnishing a separate RCMC from the Engineering Export Promotion Council, because an existing certificate from the Federation of Indian Export Organisations sufficiently established eligibility. The Court also held that REP licences obtained during the 1981-82 policy period could be endorsed and revalidated after the belated grant of the Export House Certificate, so that the petitioner was restored to the position it would have occupied if the certificate had been issued in time. The ancillary import benefits attached to the certificate for that policy year were therefore required to be made available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>