https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80356 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court. The Court emphasized the importance of trial court findings, the presumption of innocence, and the necessity for substantial evidence to prove allegations under the Gold (Control) Act. It highlighted the need for a thorough examination of evidence and legal provisions to determine authorized business premises accurately. en-us Fri, 02 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80356 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court. The Court emphasized the importance of trial court findings, the presumption of innocence, and the necessity for substantial evidence to prove allegations under the Gold (Control) Act. It highlighted the need for a thorough examination of evidence and legal provisions to determine authorized business premises accurately. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80356