<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80351</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld a penalty of Rs. 10,000 without error and rejected the rectification application as no mistake was identified in the order. The argument challenging the penalty imposition without fine was deemed invalid, leading to the dismissal of the rectification application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:30:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80351</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld a penalty of Rs. 10,000 without error and rejected the rectification application as no mistake was identified in the order. The argument challenging the penalty imposition without fine was deemed invalid, leading to the dismissal of the rectification application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>