<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80348</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the printed sheets of craft paper and duplex paperboard under Tariff Heading 4811.90, determining they were not classifiable under Heading 4901.00 or 4818.90. The case was remanded to the Assistant Collector to assess the applicability of Notification No. 49/87-C.E. and whether printing and cutting constitute manufacturing processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:25:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80348</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the printed sheets of craft paper and duplex paperboard under Tariff Heading 4811.90, determining they were not classifiable under Heading 4901.00 or 4818.90. The case was remanded to the Assistant Collector to assess the applicability of Notification No. 49/87-C.E. and whether printing and cutting constitute manufacturing processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>