https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80347 The Tribunal set aside the Collector (Appeals) order, ruling in favor of the appellants in a case involving the alleged clandestine removal of manufactured tobacco due to incomplete markings on bags. The Tribunal found that the incomplete markings did not conclusively prove clandestine removal, emphasizing the lack of tangible evidence supporting this claim. It noted that the entries in the R.G.1 register were consistent with the quantity found in the store room, indicating no double transport. As a result, the appellants were granted relief based on the lack of sufficient proof of clandestine removal. en-us Mon, 19 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:24:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80347 The Tribunal set aside the Collector (Appeals) order, ruling in favor of the appellants in a case involving the alleged clandestine removal of manufactured tobacco due to incomplete markings on bags. The Tribunal found that the incomplete markings did not conclusively prove clandestine removal, emphasizing the lack of tangible evidence supporting this claim. It noted that the entries in the R.G.1 register were consistent with the quantity found in the store room, indicating no double transport. As a result, the appellants were granted relief based on the lack of sufficient proof of clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80347