<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 263 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80332</link>
    <description>Additional evidence capable of straightforward verification and curing only a procedural lapse may be admitted at the appellate stage under Rule 23 of the CEGAT Procedure Rules, so the essentiality certificate and end-use affidavit were accepted on record. The exemption claim under Notification No. 179/80-Cus. then had to be reconsidered de novo on the basis of those documents, and the impugned orders were set aside with a remand for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:32:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 263 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80332</link>
      <description>Additional evidence capable of straightforward verification and curing only a procedural lapse may be admitted at the appellate stage under Rule 23 of the CEGAT Procedure Rules, so the essentiality certificate and end-use affidavit were accepted on record. The exemption claim under Notification No. 179/80-Cus. then had to be reconsidered de novo on the basis of those documents, and the impugned orders were set aside with a remand for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>