<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80329</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a transferred Revision application against the rejection of their Review petition by the Collector of Central Excise. The appellants faced challenges in producing necessary documents due to factory closure and turmoil, leading to the inability to file an appeal. The Tribunal found the lack of reasons for rejecting the Review petition sufficient for interference in the appeal and remanded the matter for de novo consideration. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing reasons for decisions and the Tribunal&#039;s power to intervene in cases of procedural irregularities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80329</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a transferred Revision application against the rejection of their Review petition by the Collector of Central Excise. The appellants faced challenges in producing necessary documents due to factory closure and turmoil, leading to the inability to file an appeal. The Tribunal found the lack of reasons for rejecting the Review petition sufficient for interference in the appeal and remanded the matter for de novo consideration. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing reasons for decisions and the Tribunal&#039;s power to intervene in cases of procedural irregularities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>