<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 259 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found merit in the applicant&#039;s case and dispensed with the pre-deposit of the duty amount, subject to the applicants depositing Rs. 28,00,000 in cash in four equal instalments. The order specified deadlines for payment, warned of vacation of the stay order in case of default, and directed the Revenue authority to halt recovery proceedings during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:22:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 259 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found merit in the applicant&#039;s case and dispensed with the pre-deposit of the duty amount, subject to the applicants depositing Rs. 28,00,000 in cash in four equal instalments. The order specified deadlines for payment, warned of vacation of the stay order in case of default, and directed the Revenue authority to halt recovery proceedings during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>