<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 256 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80322</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi upheld the order-in-appeal by the Collector of Customs (Appeals) in a case concerning the classification of imported Ceramic Pythagoras tubes for C.V. duty under the Customs Tariff. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of interpreting classification based on commercial sense rather than technical definitions. The decision aligned with well-established legal principles and legal precedents, highlighting the lack of merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and the failure to provide evidence supporting the classification of the goods as &#039;China-ware&#039; in the commercial sense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:11:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 256 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80322</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi upheld the order-in-appeal by the Collector of Customs (Appeals) in a case concerning the classification of imported Ceramic Pythagoras tubes for C.V. duty under the Customs Tariff. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of interpreting classification based on commercial sense rather than technical definitions. The decision aligned with well-established legal principles and legal precedents, highlighting the lack of merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and the failure to provide evidence supporting the classification of the goods as &#039;China-ware&#039; in the commercial sense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>