<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80318</link>
    <description>Polyols and isocyanates imported together for manufacture of polyurethane foam were not covered by the section notes relied on by customs, so they could not be classified as the end-product as a composite set. The appellate body accepted the Board&#039;s trade notice and held that, absent clear tariff coverage, the goods had to be assessed separately on their own merits rather than by reference to the finished product. The department&#039;s tariff classification was therefore set aside and individual assessment was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:58:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80318</link>
      <description>Polyols and isocyanates imported together for manufacture of polyurethane foam were not covered by the section notes relied on by customs, so they could not be classified as the end-product as a composite set. The appellate body accepted the Board&#039;s trade notice and held that, absent clear tariff coverage, the goods had to be assessed separately on their own merits rather than by reference to the finished product. The department&#039;s tariff classification was therefore set aside and individual assessment was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>