https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80317 Denial of cross-examination of the appellants' accountant was held not to constitute a violation of natural justice on the facts recorded, as no prejudice warranting interference was established. The Tribunal also applied its rectificatory power under Section 35C of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 to correct a mistake apparent on the record and modified the earlier order by deleting specified portions from its reasoning. The order was therefore amended only to that limited extent, while the remaining grounds were left to be heard on merits by the regular Bench. en-us Mon, 08 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:57:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80317 Denial of cross-examination of the appellants' accountant was held not to constitute a violation of natural justice on the facts recorded, as no prejudice warranting interference was established. The Tribunal also applied its rectificatory power under Section 35C of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 to correct a mistake apparent on the record and modified the earlier order by deleting specified portions from its reasoning. The order was therefore amended only to that limited extent, while the remaining grounds were left to be heard on merits by the regular Bench. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80317