<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 169 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80314</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal as time-barred under Section 35F of the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s argument that the appeal should be deemed presented on an earlier date due to a letter sent under Certificate of Posting was rejected, as the appellant failed to conclusively establish the receipt of the letter by the Collector. The Tribunal emphasized the presumption of correctness of official acts and clarified that no extension of the time limit is permissible beyond six months. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without grounds for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:53:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 169 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80314</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal as time-barred under Section 35F of the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s argument that the appeal should be deemed presented on an earlier date due to a letter sent under Certificate of Posting was rejected, as the appellant failed to conclusively establish the receipt of the letter by the Collector. The Tribunal emphasized the presumption of correctness of official acts and clarified that no extension of the time limit is permissible beyond six months. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without grounds for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>