https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80313 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against the Additional Collector's order confirming a demand for a specific period. The Tribunal held that the Additional Collector's attempt to enforce the demand based on the Supdt.'s notice, which was replaced by another notice alleging fraud and suppression, was illegal. The demand could only cover six months from the second notice's issuance date, as no suppression or fraud was found. The appeal was allowed, and the demand based on the Supdt.'s notice beyond six months was deemed illegal and unsustainable. en-us Tue, 02 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:51:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80313 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against the Additional Collector's order confirming a demand for a specific period. The Tribunal held that the Additional Collector's attempt to enforce the demand based on the Supdt.'s notice, which was replaced by another notice alleging fraud and suppression, was illegal. The demand could only cover six months from the second notice's issuance date, as no suppression or fraud was found. The appeal was allowed, and the demand based on the Supdt.'s notice beyond six months was deemed illegal and unsustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80313