<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80299</link>
    <description>Silicone emulsion made by mixing imported silicone oil with other ingredients was treated as a preparation containing silicone, not silicone in primary form. Applying the earlier larger-bench approach, the product was classified under the tariff entry for such preparations rather than the entry reserved for primary silicones, and the mixing process was regarded as producing a distinct commercial product. On limitation, the duty demand could not extend beyond the statutory six-month period because suppression of facts or wilful misstatement was not established. Recovery, if otherwise sustainable, was confined to that period and the demand beyond it was time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80299</link>
      <description>Silicone emulsion made by mixing imported silicone oil with other ingredients was treated as a preparation containing silicone, not silicone in primary form. Applying the earlier larger-bench approach, the product was classified under the tariff entry for such preparations rather than the entry reserved for primary silicones, and the mixing process was regarded as producing a distinct commercial product. On limitation, the duty demand could not extend beyond the statutory six-month period because suppression of facts or wilful misstatement was not established. Recovery, if otherwise sustainable, was confined to that period and the demand beyond it was time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>