<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80297</link>
    <description>Questions of law arising out of a Tribunal order must be referred under the governing reference provision, and the Tribunal cannot refuse reference merely because the dispute has allegedly become final or the questions may appear academic. The power to decline an unnecessary or academic question lies with the High Court, not the Tribunal. On that basis, the objection to maintainability of the reference was rejected and all five questions of law were referred for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:34:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80297</link>
      <description>Questions of law arising out of a Tribunal order must be referred under the governing reference provision, and the Tribunal cannot refuse reference merely because the dispute has allegedly become final or the questions may appear academic. The power to decline an unnecessary or academic question lies with the High Court, not the Tribunal. On that basis, the objection to maintainability of the reference was rejected and all five questions of law were referred for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>