<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 165 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s order confiscating 10 kgs of Palladium Chloride, ruling in favor of the appellants. The burden of proving illegal importation was on the Department, which failed to provide concrete evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear violations of customs regulations before confiscation and penalties could be imposed, highlighting the importance of substantial proof in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:42:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 165 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s order confiscating 10 kgs of Palladium Chloride, ruling in favor of the appellants. The burden of proving illegal importation was on the Department, which failed to provide concrete evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear violations of customs regulations before confiscation and penalties could be imposed, highlighting the importance of substantial proof in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>