<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 157 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80271</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the classification list benefits claimed under Notifications 175/86 and 138/86. It was held that the respondents were not restricted to availing benefits under Notification 175/86 only and could choose either Notification. The Tribunal found no legal basis to compel the respondents to opt for Notification 138/86 when they were eligible for benefits under both Notifications, affirming the Collector&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:24:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 157 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80271</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the classification list benefits claimed under Notifications 175/86 and 138/86. It was held that the respondents were not restricted to availing benefits under Notification 175/86 only and could choose either Notification. The Tribunal found no legal basis to compel the respondents to opt for Notification 138/86 when they were eligible for benefits under both Notifications, affirming the Collector&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>