<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 154 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80268</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Topaz Commerce Limited against a penalty imposed under Rule 173Q for Central Excise Rules violations. The Tribunal found no deliberate violation or intent to evade duty, emphasizing the absence of mala fide intention. It ruled that Rule 173Q did not apply to the delayed duty payment situation, leading to the refund of the penalty paid by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:17:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 154 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80268</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Topaz Commerce Limited against a penalty imposed under Rule 173Q for Central Excise Rules violations. The Tribunal found no deliberate violation or intent to evade duty, emphasizing the absence of mala fide intention. It ruled that Rule 173Q did not apply to the delayed duty payment situation, leading to the refund of the penalty paid by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>