<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 146 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80260</link>
    <description>A delayed appeal cannot be condoned where the applicant had consciously chosen not to file within the prescribed limitation period and later changed its view. The Tribunal held that sufficient cause requires a satisfactory explanation for failure to act in time, and a deliberate initial decision not to prosecute the appeal does not meet that standard. As the delay resulted from an informed choice rather than an unavoidable impediment, the discretion to condone delay was ? No, sorry. The prayer for condonation was rejected and the appeal was held time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 146 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80260</link>
      <description>A delayed appeal cannot be condoned where the applicant had consciously chosen not to file within the prescribed limitation period and later changed its view. The Tribunal held that sufficient cause requires a satisfactory explanation for failure to act in time, and a deliberate initial decision not to prosecute the appeal does not meet that standard. As the delay resulted from an informed choice rather than an unavoidable impediment, the discretion to condone delay was ? No, sorry. The prayer for condonation was rejected and the appeal was held time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>