https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80256 The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)' decision that the Department could not raise a demand for differential duty in the RT 12 return due to the pending matter before CEGAT and the correct payment made by the assessee as per the approved classification and price list. The RT 12 return cannot substitute the demand under Section 11A, and the Superintendent's action was deemed correct in law. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:48:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80256 The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)' decision that the Department could not raise a demand for differential duty in the RT 12 return due to the pending matter before CEGAT and the correct payment made by the assessee as per the approved classification and price list. The RT 12 return cannot substitute the demand under Section 11A, and the Superintendent's action was deemed correct in law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80256