<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 269 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80254</link>
    <description>Under Notification No. 175/86, the exemption limit of Rs. 15 lakhs was to apply separately to each specified category of goods, subject to the overall aggregate limit of Rs. 30 lakhs. The Tribunal rejected an interpretation that would make exemption depend on the sequence in which different goods were cleared, as that would irrationally discriminate between manufacturers based on production or market planning. So long as the other conditions of the notification were satisfied, duty-paid clearances of one category did not reduce the exemption available for another category. The refund claim was therefore required to be reconsidered on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:39:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 269 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80254</link>
      <description>Under Notification No. 175/86, the exemption limit of Rs. 15 lakhs was to apply separately to each specified category of goods, subject to the overall aggregate limit of Rs. 30 lakhs. The Tribunal rejected an interpretation that would make exemption depend on the sequence in which different goods were cleared, as that would irrationally discriminate between manufacturers based on production or market planning. So long as the other conditions of the notification were satisfied, duty-paid clearances of one category did not reduce the exemption available for another category. The refund claim was therefore required to be reconsidered on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>