<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 266 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80251</link>
    <description>For refund under Section 11B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, limitation runs from payment of assessed duty, not from a mere debit in the PLA made before final assessment is completed. The excise scheme treated the assessee&#039;s self-determination as provisional until approval of the classification list, price list, and RT-12 assessment by the proper officer. Because Section 11B did not treat the PLA debit date as the relevant date, a refund application filed before approval of the classification list could not be time-barred. Excess duty arising from later approval of exemption remained refundable or adjustable consequentially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:34:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 266 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80251</link>
      <description>For refund under Section 11B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, limitation runs from payment of assessed duty, not from a mere debit in the PLA made before final assessment is completed. The excise scheme treated the assessee&#039;s self-determination as provisional until approval of the classification list, price list, and RT-12 assessment by the proper officer. Because Section 11B did not treat the PLA debit date as the relevant date, a refund application filed before approval of the classification list could not be time-barred. Excess duty arising from later approval of exemption remained refundable or adjustable consequentially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>