https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80247 The appellants were denied entitlement to input relief under Rule 56A(8) due to changes in nomenclature under a new Tariff. As their product was not originally benefiting from Rule 56A but from Notification 95/83, the deletion of their product from the notification rendered them ineligible for Rule 56A(8) benefits. The court held that since the substantive concession was under Notification 95/83 and not Rule 56A, the appellants could not avail themselves of Rule 56A(8) benefits. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:26:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80247 The appellants were denied entitlement to input relief under Rule 56A(8) due to changes in nomenclature under a new Tariff. As their product was not originally benefiting from Rule 56A but from Notification 95/83, the deletion of their product from the notification rendered them ineligible for Rule 56A(8) benefits. The court held that since the substantive concession was under Notification 95/83 and not Rule 56A, the appellants could not avail themselves of Rule 56A(8) benefits. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80247