<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 261 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80246</link>
    <description>Imported goods must match the import policy description on evidence to qualify for Open General Licence treatment. The apparatus claimed as blood cell separators was found not to effect any separation of blood cells, and no trade evidence or supplier literature supported that description. Earlier clearance of similar goods did not create a legal basis for treating the present misdescribed import as compliant. In the absence of proof supporting the claimed classification, the import was treated as misdescription attracting confiscation, and the redemption fine was left undisturbed because no material showed it to be excessive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 261 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80246</link>
      <description>Imported goods must match the import policy description on evidence to qualify for Open General Licence treatment. The apparatus claimed as blood cell separators was found not to effect any separation of blood cells, and no trade evidence or supplier literature supported that description. Earlier clearance of similar goods did not create a legal basis for treating the present misdescribed import as compliant. In the absence of proof supporting the claimed classification, the import was treated as misdescription attracting confiscation, and the redemption fine was left undisturbed because no material showed it to be excessive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>