<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 257 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases to the Assistant Collector of Central Excise for verification of the actual utilization of track materials and the validity of the certificate produced by the appellants. The appeals were disposed of by remand, and the cross-objection filed by the department was dismissed as not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 257 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases to the Assistant Collector of Central Excise for verification of the actual utilization of track materials and the validity of the certificate produced by the appellants. The appeals were disposed of by remand, and the cross-objection filed by the department was dismissed as not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>