<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 231 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80236</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a partial stay in the case, directing the applicants to deposit the amount from the first show cause notice within four weeks. Upon this deposit, recovery of the amount demanded in the second notice was stayed until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal considered factors such as the historical classification under Tariff Item 68, the applicants&#039; financial hardship, and the time-barred nature of the second show cause notice in reaching this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:06:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 231 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80236</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a partial stay in the case, directing the applicants to deposit the amount from the first show cause notice within four weeks. Upon this deposit, recovery of the amount demanded in the second notice was stayed until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal considered factors such as the historical classification under Tariff Item 68, the applicants&#039; financial hardship, and the time-barred nature of the second show cause notice in reaching this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>